Winter ulcer diagnostics: Unpacking a sore subject

Moritella viscosa is the bacterium most often associated with winter ulcers in Scotland. It penetrates the skin surface, forms a biofilm on the scales and produces toxins that destroy surrounding tissue, leading to deep ulcers. Other bacteria then thrive in the ulcers.

The disease is complex and poses a serious challenge for salmon farming, causing fish suffering, mortality, and reduced harvest quality. So how should farmers investigate the lesions?

Chris Matthews, fish veterinarian and Business Unit Director at PHARMAQ Analytiq UK, warns against relying on PCR alone in winter ulcer diagnostics. Many farmers choose PCR for its speed, but it only tells part of the story.

“While PCR is excellent for speed and sensitivity, it’s essentially a yes/no detector for DNA. It cannot tell you if bacteria are alive, how they are behaving, or if your current vaccines are a good match for the specific strain on that farm. With Moritella viscosa, we need it in culture to understand its phenotype.”

The benefits of a holistic approach

Matthews recommends a holistic diagnostic approach, starting with microbiology – which helps reveal the full range of bacteria present in ulcers.

Microbiology requires living bacterial samples. Matthews recommends sampling both the ulcer and internal organs such as the head kidney, to check whether the bacteria have spread inside the fish. Samples should be plated onto fresh agar on site and kept cool during transport to the lab.

In the lab, microbiologists culture the living sample material and study bacterial growth over time. They observe the physical appearance of each colony, noting the characteristics: if it’s raised or flat, smooth or rough, haemolytic or transparent. These descriptions enable microbiologists to identify different variants and subtypes.

Microbiology also works well alongside other diagnostic methods. "You can supplement with PCR to rapidly confirm specific findings, or with histopathology to examine tissue changes more closely," says Matthews.

Complex causes

While winter ulcers frequently involve bacteria such as Moritella viscosa, Tenacibaculum and Aliivibrio wodanis, the external environment plays a significant role in their development.

“Fish are likely frequently being exposed to these bacteria, which are a natural part of the bacterioplankton of seawater, but the pathogen is held at bay by a healthy immune response and the protective mucus layer which overlies the skin,” Matthews says.

“Low temperatures are known to upregulate many of the virulence mechanisms in Moritella viscosa, and in cold temperatures the fish’s immune response is lower – so the balance is tipped in favour of the pathogen’s ability to form an ulcer.”

In recent years, advancements in delousing technology have allowed the industry to move away from chemical treatments for sea lice. However, increased physical handling events increase the chance of micro-abrasions to the skin, Matthews explains.

“Despite appearing to our eye to be surface structures, scales in healthy fish are in fact protected by a layer of skin known as the epidermis. Micro-abrasions to this delicate structure expose scales and make it easier for ulcer-forming bacteria to establish.”

This complexity underscores why Matthews advocates a holistic diagnostic approach.

Skin lesions may have different causes

Winter ulcers are usually easy to recognise on site, but fish health teams should always consider whether the lesions could have a different cause.

“In rare cases, piscirickettsiosis or even ruptured furunculosis lesions have been misidentified as winter ulcers. Moritella viscosa can even return a weak positive on PCR in such cases, without actually being responsible for the lesions,” cautions Matthews.

Occasionally, no pathogenic bacteria are present in a case at all, which might point to other infectious or non-infectious causes, explains Matthews.